Articles in E-pub version are posted online ahead of regular printed publication.
Original Article
- The Impact of Limited Insurance Coverage on Long-Term Persistence with Anti-CGRP Monoclonal Antibody Therapy: A Multicenter Real-World Study in Korea
-
Mi-Kyoung Kang, Jong-Hee Sohn, Myoung-Jin Cha, Yoo Hwan Kim, Yooha Hong, Hee-Jin Im, Soo-Jin Cho
-
Received February 14, 2026 Accepted April 23, 2026 Published online June 4, 2026
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62087/hpr.2026.0007
[Epub ahead of print]
-
-
Abstract
PDF
- Purpose: Anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (anti-CGRP mAbs) are effective preventive therapies for migraine. However, their high cost limits long-term use. In Korea, coverage of anti-CGRP mAbs by the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) is highly restricted. This study aimed to evaluate the association between NHIS coverage and treatment persistence in a real-world setting.
Methods
This retrospective multicenter study included adult patients with migraine (≥18 years) who received anti-CGRP mAb therapy at four tertiary hospitals in Korea. Treatment compliance was assessed using persistence, defined as continuous treatment duration; persistence rates; and adherence, defined as the proportion of days covered. Reasons for treatment discontinuation were also analyzed. Treatment compliance was compared according to NHIS coverage, and treatment effectiveness was compared according to NHIS coverage and treatment continuation.
Results
Among 140 patients treated with anti-CGRP mAbs, only 12 (8.6%) received NHIS-covered therapy. Compared with the non-covered group, the NHIS-covered group had a lower discontinuation rate (50.0% [6/12] vs. 73.4% [94/128]; p=0.101) and higher persistence rates at 6 months (80.0% vs. 66.0%; p=0.493) and 12 months (66.7% vs. 47.2%; p=0.312). However, these differences were not statistically significant. Treatment effectiveness, assessed by changes in monthly headache days, did not differ significantly according to NHIS coverage or treatment continuation.
Conclusion
Treatment persistence appears to be influenced by multiple factors in real-world practice. NHIS coverage may support treatment continuation by improving access and reducing the financial burden. These findings highlight the importance of healthcare-system factors in optimizing long-term preventive treatment strategies for migraine.
Review Article
- Trigeminal Neuralgia: Pathophysiology, Clinical Features, and Therapeutic Management
-
Ekene Nnagha, Chidubem Adi, Daniel Akpan
-
Received January 27, 2026 Accepted March 17, 2026 Published online June 4, 2026
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62087/hpr.2026.0005
[Epub ahead of print]
-
-
Abstract
PDF
- Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a severe, disabling neuropathic facial pain disorder classified among cranial neuralgias within headache medicine. Despite well-established diagnostic criteria, TN remains frequently misdiagnosed, particularly in dental and primary care settings. This review provides a clinically focused overview of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, classification, diagnostic approach, and contemporary management of TN, with relevance to headache and pain research and clinical practice. Neurovascular compression with focal demyelination at the trigeminal nerve root entry zone is considered the predominant mechanism in classical TN. Diagnosis is primarily clinical and guided by International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition criteria, with magnetic resonance imaging essential for excluding secondary and idiopathic causes. Carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine remain first-line therapies, whereas microvascular decompression and minimally invasive neurosurgical procedures provide effective options for medically refractory disease. TN requires accurate diagnosis and individualized management. Advances in pharmacological and interventional treatments have improved outcomes and underscore the importance of multidisciplinary care within headache and pain medicine.
Letter to the Editor