Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Headache and Pain Research : Headache and Pain Research

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
3 "Quality of life"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Review Article
Interictal Burden of Migraine: A Narrative Review
Soo-Kyoung Kim, Todd J. Schwedt
Headache Pain Res. 2025;26(3):200-208.   Published online October 21, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62087/hpr.2025.0018
  • 211 View
  • 7 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
Migraine is a chronic neurological disorder associated with substantial disability and societal costs. Traditionally, research and clinical care have focused on the ictal phase, characterized by headache and accompanying symptoms. However, growing evidence suggests that a considerable portion of migraine-related disability occurs between attacks, known as the interictal burden (IIB). IIB encompasses a wide spectrum of cognitive, emotional, sensory, and functional impairments that persist during headache-free periods, including fatigue, allodynia, photophobia, cognitive dysfunction, anticipatory anxiety, and social withdrawal. These symptoms can markedly reduce quality of life, work productivity, and family functioning, even in individuals with infrequent attacks. In a descriptive survey of 506 migraine respondents, 67% experienced severe IIB. The effects of IIB extend beyond patients themselves, contributing to presenteeism in the workplace and imposing emotional and logistical strain within families. Several instruments, including the Migraine Interictal Burden Scale (MIBS-4), Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ v2.1), Headache Impact Test (HIT-6), and Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS), have been employed to assess different dimensions of IIB. Nonetheless, no single comprehensive and standardized tool fully captures the multidimensional nature of IIB. Recognizing and addressing IIB is essential for delivering holistic, patient-centered migraine care. Future research should focus on developing validated assessment instruments and incorporating IIB measures into clinical trials and routine practice to better understand and alleviate the hidden burden of migraine.
Original Article
Premonitory Symptoms in Migraine: Implications for Disease Burden and Cognitive Impairment, with Some Promising Answers
Utku Topbaş, Bahar Taşdelen, Nevra Öksüz Gürlen, Aynur Özge
Headache Pain Res. 2025;26(2):130-141.   Published online May 26, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62087/hpr.2024.0031
Correction in: Headache Pain Res 2025;26(3):232
  • 4,510 View
  • 41 Download
  • 2 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose: This study evaluated the prevalence and impact of premonitory symptoms (PS) in people with migraine, assessing their influence on disability, cognitive function, and quality of life.
Methods
In a cross-sectional analysis at Mersin University Hospital, 186 migraine patients were interviewed to identify the presence of PS, using a structured questionnaire that included measures of disability (Migraine Disability Assessment Scale or MIDAS), quality of life (European Health Impact Scale or EUROHIS-8), and cognition (Migraine Attack Related Subjective Cognitive Scale or Mig-SCOG). Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, the t-test, and the Mann-Whitney U-test, with a significance threshold set at p<0.05.
Results
Among participants, 74.7% reported one or more PS, with the most common being neck stiffness (64.7%), photophobia (56.8%), fatigue (52.8%), and phonophobia (50.3%). Patients with PS demonstrated significantly lower quality of life scores (EUROHIS-8, p<0.001) and higher cognitive impairment scores (Mig-SCOG, p<0.001) than those without PS, despite similar levels of migraine disability (MIDAS, p=0.050).
Conclusion
The high prevalence of PS in people with migraine and their association with greater cognitive impairment and reduced quality of life indicate that more targeted interventions are necessary in this subgroup. PS may be either a driver of cognitive and quality of life burden or just a marker of it, and disambiguating these possibilities will be a critical area for future research and clinical focus. More optimized and standardized prospective studies are needed to clarify the prevalence of PS.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Toward Precision Migraine Care: Genetics, Symptoms, and Big-Data-Driven Approaches
    Soo-Jin Cho
    Headache and Pain Research.2025; 26(3): 171.     CrossRef
  • Interictal Burden of Migraine: A Narrative Review
    Soo-Kyoung Kim, Todd J. Schwedt
    Headache and Pain Research.2025; 26(3): 200.     CrossRef
Review Article
Efficacy and Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Postherpetic Neuralgia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Abdallah Abbas, Basant Lashin, Mohamed Abouzid, Hadir Mustafa Mohamed, Mohamed El-Moslemani, Mohamed A. Zanaty, Haneen Sabet, Dina Essam Abo-elnour, Ahmed Ibrahim Ghonimy Shedid, Mohamed Salah Mohamed Syed, Amna Hussein, Hoda Awad, Ahmed M. Raslan
Headache Pain Res. 2025;26(2):91-105.   Published online April 16, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.62087/hpr.2024.0032
  • 9,476 View
  • 72 Download
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for pain management in postherpetic neuralgia (PHN). A comprehensive literature search was conducted through May 2024 in Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Eligible studies included clinical trials, observational, and case-control studies. Two reviewers independently screened studies and extracted data. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 for randomized controlled trials and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager v.5.3, with heterogeneity evaluated by chi-square and I² tests. Five studies (245 patients) were included, with rTMS sessions ranging from 10 to 28. Meta-analysis showed significant pain reduction with rTMS compared to sham treatment. At 2 weeks post-treatment, the mean pain score difference (visual analogue scale) was –1.44 (95% CI: –2.12 to –0.77; p<0.0001), with sustained relief at 1 and 3 months. However, no significant differences were found in the patient’s global impression of change scale, sleep quality, quality of life (QoL), medication regulation, or adverse events. rTMS exerted a consistent pain relief effect of rTMS, but its impact on broader aspects of patient well-being was less clear. rTMS provides sustained pain relief in PHN for up to 3 months, but its impact on QoL and secondary outcomes remains unclear, warranting further investigation.

Headache and Pain Research : Headache and Pain Research
TOP